How Short-Sighted Narratives Undermine Minnesota’s Somali Success Story
Bad politics rarely stops at bad ideas. More often, it produces petty outcomes; fear, division, and the deliberate misunderstanding of entire communities. Few examples illustrate this better than the way Minnesota’s Somali community is discussed during moments of political tension.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!The Somali community in Minnesota did not arrive quietly, and it did not remain invisible. Since the early 1990s, Somali Minnesotans have built lives, businesses, and institutions in one of America’s coldest states after fleeing one of the world’s most devastating civil wars. Their story is not one of charity, it is one of contribution. Yet when politics turns cynical, success itself becomes suspicious.
From Refugees to Economic Actors
Somali Minnesotans are among the most entrepreneurial immigrant communities in the state. With limited access to traditional capital, they created their own pathways to business ownership. The now-famous “Somali mall” model, seen in places like Karmel Mall and 24 Mall, transformed empty or struggling commercial spaces into vibrant economic hubs. These centers house hundreds of small businesses; restaurants, boutiques, professional services, logistics firms, that employ thousands and generate tax revenue.
Commercial corridors such as Lake Street and Cedar-Riverside did not revive themselves. Somali business owners filled vacant storefronts, increased foot traffic, and restored economic life where disinvestment once dominated. That is not dependency. That is local economic development.
Yet bad politics reframes this visibility as threat instead of progress.
Collective Strength, Not Collective Guilt
Somali culture is deeply communal. Mutual aid, informal safety nets, and shared responsibility are not loopholes, they are survival mechanisms refined over generations. New arrivals are helped with housing, employment, and navigation of complex systems not because the state fails, but because community solidarity works faster.
Hospitality; martisoor, is a core value. Mosques, elders, and community organizations provide support, guidance, and accountability. These structures have helped stabilize families and guide youth toward education and civic participation.
But in moments of scandal, collectivism is mischaracterized as collusion. The actions of a few individuals are inflated into accusations against tens of thousands. That is not justice, it is collective punishment, and it is a hallmark of petty politics.
Civic Engagement Is Not a Crime
Somali Minnesotans did not wait generations to engage civically. They organized, voted, ran for office, and made history. Minnesota became home to the first Somali-American state legislator and the first Somali-American woman elected to the state senate. High voter turnout and grassroots mobilization are signs of democratic health, not manipulation.
But bad politics thrives on suspicion. When a community votes in large numbers, it is accused of being “controlled.” When it produces leaders, it is accused of being “favored.” Participation is rebranded as influence, and influence as conspiracy.
This is how democracy gets distorted, not by immigrants, but by those who resent inclusion.
Culture, Faith, and the Next Generation
Somalis come from a society long known as the “Nation of Poets.” In Minnesota, poetry, storytelling, and oral tradition continue to connect elders and youth, preserving identity while adapting to American life. Faith remains central, with mosques serving not just as places of worship, but as centers of education, mentorship, and moral grounding.
The younger generation is increasingly visible in universities across Minnesota, pursuing careers in medicine, law, technology, and public service. These are long-term investments in the state’s future, quiet, steady, and measurable.
Bad politics ignores this horizon. It focuses only on headlines, not trajectories.
The Real Cost of Petty Outcomes
When political leaders use entire communities as talking points, the damage spreads beyond rhetoric. Businesses lose customers. Families withdraw from public life. Trust between institutions and residents erodes. Innocent people live with fear, not because they broke the law, but because they share an identity.
That is the petty outcome of bad politics: everyone loses.
Minnesota’s strength has always come from its ability to turn newcomers into neighbors and contributors. The Somali community is not an exception to that tradition, it is proof of it.
The question, then, is not whether Somalis belong in Minnesota’s story. They already do.
The real question is whether Minnesota will allow bad politics to overshadow good progress, or whether it will recognize that economic contribution, civic engagement, and cultural resilience are signs of success, not suspicion.
