The decision by billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman to donate $10,000 to a fundraiser supporting the ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Nicole Good has ignited a national backlash, raising painful questions about power, accountability, and whose lives are valued in moments of state violence.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!Renee Good, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen and mother, was shot and killed in Minneapolis during what federal officials describe as an active ICE operation. The Trump administration immediately labeled the shooting an act of self-defense, praised the agent, Jonathan Ross, as a hero, and controversially described Good as a “domestic terrorist.” Local leaders, civil rights advocates, and Good’s family have strongly rejected that characterization, calling for a fair and independent investigation.
Into this already tense situation stepped Bill Ackman. By publicly donating to Ross’s GoFundMe, Ackman transformed a legal case into a moral and political statement.
Ackman defended his decision by saying he believes in the principle that “one is innocent until proven guilty.” He added that he had also intended to donate to the GoFundMe for Good’s family, but it had already closed after raising more than $1.5 million. He called the situation “a tragedy,” framing it as a moment where an officer doing his job and a protester acting in haste collided with fatal consequences.
But for many Americans, especially in Minnesota, the donation does not feel neutral. It feels like a reward for lethal force before any court has ruled, before accountability has been established, and while serious questions remain unanswered.
New video footage released after the shooting has complicated the federal narrative. Critics argue that it contradicts claims of immediate danger and raises doubts about whether deadly force was justified. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey have openly disputed the administration’s account, describing the shooting as a reckless abuse of power and demanding an independent investigation.
Against that backdrop, Ackman’s donation appears to many as more than charity. It appears as an endorsement of a version of events that absolves the shooter and condemns the victim.
The fundraiser itself remains unverified. GoFundMe has confirmed that all campaigns related to the shooting are under review and that funds are currently frozen. The platform’s rules prohibit fundraising for the legal defense of individuals formally charged with violent crimes, meaning the entire campaign could be removed depending on the outcome of the investigation.
Still, more than 8,000 people have donated, raising hundreds of thousands of dollars. Ackman’s $10,000 contribution sits at the top of the list, symbolizing how wealth and influence can shape public perception long before justice is delivered.
Meanwhile, Good’s family fundraiser was paused after raising over $1.5 million. While some see this as proof of widespread support for the victim, others note the stark contrast: one fundraiser seeks to comfort a grieving family, the other to financially empower the person who pulled the trigger.
This is where the word “reward” becomes unavoidable.
No court has ruled. No final facts have been established. Yet money is already flowing toward the shooter. That reality sends a message: in America, those who hold weapons and authority may receive financial and political protection long before victims receive justice.
Ackman’s action reflects a broader pattern where power aligns with power. The federal government praises the agent. A billionaire funds him. The victim’s identity is attacked. The family is left to defend her dignity.
This is not about denying due process to the officer. He deserves a fair legal process. But so did Renee Good. So does her family. And so does the public, which deserves truth rather than narratives shaped by wealth, politics, and fear.
When billionaires donate to those who kill before courts decide, it risks turning justice into a marketplace. It risks telling ordinary people that accountability is optional when power is involved.
That is why this moment matters.
Not because of one donation, but because of what it represents:
Who gets defended.
Who gets rewarded.
And who gets Killed.
